Skip to main content
flight_takeoff Drone Ranker
equalizer Head-to-Head Battle

Autel EVO Nano+ vs Autel X-Star Premium

The Autel EVO Nano+ and the X-Star Premium are five years and several drone generations apart, and the newer model wins almost every category. The Nano+ weighs 249 g against 1.42 kg, folds to 142×94×55 mm, shoots 50 MP stills...

WINNER Autel EVO Nano+
8.3
Autel EVO Nano+ vs Autel X-Star Premium
AUTEL EVO NANO+
8.3
VS
AUTEL X-STAR PREMI
6.6
OUR TOP PICK

Autel EVO Nano+

$799 at launch (2021); discontinued

8.3
Autel EVO Nano+
check_circle 1/1.28-inch 50 MP sensor with an f/1.9 lens, far larger than the X-Star's 12 MP camera
check_circle 249 g folding design that fits a jacket pocket
check_circle Forward, backward and downward obstacle sensing

Autel X-Star Premium

$899 in 2016; discontinued

6.6
Autel X-Star Premium
check_circle Starpoint optical positioning holds position at low altitude without GPS
check_circle Quick-release 3-axis gimbal camera
check_circle Controller with a built-in telemetry screen; a phone shows the live view

Performance Breakdown

Camera Quality A: 8.6 vs B: 6.6
Flight Performance A: 8.2 vs B: 6.8
Build Quality A: 8.2 vs B: 7.2
Value for Money A: 8.0 vs B: 6.0
VS

Autel EVO Nano+

add_circle PROS

  • 1/1.28-inch 50 MP sensor with an f/1.9 lens, far larger than the X-Star's 12 MP camera
  • 249 g folding design that fits a jacket pocket
  • Forward, backward and downward obstacle sensing
  • SkyLink transmission rated at 10 km (FCC) with 2.7K live view
  • 28-minute rated flight time and 4K HDR video

remove_circle CONS

  • Autel stopped selling the Nano series worldwide in July 2025, so new units are scarce
  • Video tops out at 4K/30fps, with no 4K/60
  • No internal storage; a microSD card is required
  • Light airframe is more affected by strong wind than a 1.4 kg drone

Autel X-Star Premium

add_circle PROS

  • Starpoint optical positioning holds position at low altitude without GPS
  • Quick-release 3-axis gimbal camera
  • Controller with a built-in telemetry screen; a phone shows the live view
  • Slightly higher top speed of 16 m/s

remove_circle CONS

  • No obstacle sensing in any direction
  • 12 MP stills and a 2 km, 720p live view
  • 1.42 kg non-folding airframe: in the US it must be registered with the FAA and broadcast Remote ID, usually via an add-on module
  • Discontinued for years; batteries and spare parts are hard to find
verified
DRONE RANKER VERDICT

The Quick Verdict

The Autel EVO Nano+ and the X-Star Premium are five years and several drone generations apart, and the newer model wins almost every category. The Nano+ weighs 249 g against 1.42 kg, folds to 142×94×55 mm, shoots 50 MP stills and 4K HDR video from a 1/1.28-inch sensor behind an f/1.9 lens, senses obstacles forwards, backwards and downwards, and its SkyLink link is rated at 10 km in FCC regions with a 2.7K live view. The X-Star Premium, Autel's 2016 answer to the DJI Phantom, shoots 12 MP stills and 4K/30 video, has no obstacle sensing and sends a 720p feed over about 2 km. It does fly slightly faster at 16 m/s, and its large battery and Starpoint optical positioning made it a stable platform for its time. Both drones are discontinued: Autel ended worldwide sales of the Nano series in July 2025, with support promised until July 2030, and the X-Star has been out of production for years. If you are choosing between used units, the EVO Nano+ is the clear pick, and in the US its 249 g weight also changes the paperwork, while the 1.42 kg X-Star needs FAA registration and a Remote ID solution.

fact_check Reviewed against cited specifications and documented sources
Alihan Demirdaş
Alihan Demirdaş Specification Researcher & Editor

Alihan Demirdaş is the founder and editor of Drone Ranker. A software developer by profession, he researches drones the way he reads code: from the primary documents. Every review, comparison and news story on the site is written by him from manufacturer specification sheets, FCC and EU certification filings, aviation-authority rules and dated press releases, with the source linked. Unless a page is labelled hands-on, the analysis is documentary; when an aircraft is in his hands, the page says so and carries his own photographs and flight notes. He covers consumer, professional and agricultural drones and is based in Türkiye.

calendar_today Published: October 9, 2026 science How We Test
info Documentary analysis by our editor from official specifications; pages that include hands-on testing are labelled as such. Affiliate Disclosure Editorial Policy

Technical Specifications

Last updated: Oct 2026
Feature Autel EVO Nano+ Autel X-Star Premium
Weight 249 g stars 1.42 kg with battery and propellers
Dimensions 142×94×55 mm folded; 260×325×55 mm unfolded stars 350 mm diagonal wheelbase (non-folding)
Volume 734 cm³ folded Not published
Max Speed 15 m/s (Ludicrous mode) 16 m/s stars
Max Flight Distance 10 km (FCC) / 5 km (CE) transmission range stars 2 km (FCC) HD live view range
Sensor Size 1/1.28-inch CMOS stars Sony Exmor R CMOS (size not confirmed by Autel's listings)
Megapixels 50 MP stars 12 MP
Max ISO 6400 stars Not published
Flight Time 28 mins stars 25 mins
Max Resolution 4K/30fps 4K/30fps
Movie Bitrate 100 Mbps stars Not published
Field of View 85° 108° stars
Transmission Range 10 km (SkyLink, FCC) stars 2 km (720p live view, 900 MHz video link)
Wind Resistance Level 5 (up to about 10 m/s) stars Not published
Obstacle Avoidance Forward, backward and downward binocular sensing stars None
Battery Power 2250 mAh, 7.7 V (17.32 Wh) 4900 mAh, 14.8 V LiPo stars
Charge Time About 90 mins About 60 mins stars
Internal Storage None (microSD up to 256 GB) None (microSD)
GPS Yes Yes
Obstacle Detection Yes No
Return to Home Yes Yes
Removable Battery Yes Yes
Shoots RAW Yes Not confirmed
HDR Mode Yes No
Weather Sealed No No
Best For Travellers who want a light folding drone with a large sensor and obstacle sensing stars Owners of a used unit, or collectors; not a new purchase in 2026
Aperture f/1.9 stars Not published
Photo resolution 8192×6144 (50 MP) stars 12 MP
Slow motion 1080p/60fps 1080p/120fps, 720p/240fps stars
Live view Up to 2.7K stars 720p
Folding design Yes stars No
Low-altitude positioning without GPS Downward vision sensors Starpoint optical positioning
Status Discontinued July 2025, support to July 2030 stars Discontinued

This is a specification-based editorial analysis using Autel's published specifications, retailer listings and the sources below. No physical product testing is claimed.

Five years of Autel progress

The X-Star Premium was Autel's first big consumer hit, an orange quadcopter sold from 2016 as a cheaper alternative to the DJI Phantom. The EVO Nano+ arrived in late 2021 as Autel's answer to the DJI Mini series. Comparing them shows how quickly consumer drones shrank: the Nano+ weighs less than a fifth of the X-Star's 1.42 kg and folds small enough for a jacket pocket, while carrying a far larger image sensor.

Camera

The Nano+ uses a 1/1.28-inch 50 MP sensor behind an f/1.9 lens with an 85° field of view, records 4K at up to 30 fps at 100 Mbps and supports 4K HDR video and merged HDR stills. The X-Star Premium uses a Sony Exmor R sensor rated at 12 MP, records 4K/30 and offers 1080p at 120 fps and 720p at 240 fps for slow motion through a 108° lens. For stills and low-light work the Nano+ is in a different class; only for slow-motion clips does the older drone have an edge.

Flight, range and safety

The Nano+ is rated for 28 minutes and 15 m/s, with SkyLink transmission good for 10 km in FCC regions and a live view of up to 2.7K. It senses obstacles forwards, backwards and downwards. The X-Star Premium is rated for 25 minutes and 16 m/s, sends a 720p feed over about 2 km and has no obstacle sensing at all, although its Starpoint positioning helps it hold position at low altitude when GPS is weak.

Buying used in 2026

  • EVO Nano+: Autel ended worldwide sales in July 2025 but promised support, firmware and repairs until July 2030, which makes a used unit a more sensible buy.
  • X-Star Premium: out of production for years; check battery health and availability before paying anything, because the drone is useless without working packs.
  • US rules: the 1.42 kg X-Star must be registered with the FAA and broadcast Remote ID. The 249 g Nano+ is below the 250 g threshold for recreational registration, but commercial flights need registration regardless.
  • Neither drone can receive a new FCC authorization under the December 2025 Covered List rules, so expect no new US variants.

The Friday Brief

One email a week on what changed in drones

FCC and FAA rule changes, DJI leaks checked against filings, and the week’s new comparisons. Every Friday, nothing else.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Sent with Kit; see our privacy policy.

Follow us on Google too: add Drone Ranker as a preferred source →

Why Trust Drone Ranker?

analytics Data-Driven Rankings We analyze 25+ technical specs per drone using official manufacturer data and industry benchmarks.
group Editorial Review Written and checked by Alihan Demirdaş, founder and editor, for clarity, sourcing and consistency before publication. Masthead →
visibility Transparent Process No paid reviews. No sponsored rankings. Affiliate links are clearly marked. Full methodology →
Editorial research

Context, limitations, and sources

Verified Oct 9, 2026

Both drones are discontinued, so this is a used-market decision. The EVO Nano+ is the better buy on every published camera, range, sensing and portability figure, and Autel promises support until July 2030. The X-Star Premium only makes sense as a cheap backup or a collector's piece.

Limitations

Specification-based comparison; no hands-on testing. Autel's own Nano+ spec page did not load, so figures come from Autel's shop page and a dealer spec sheet. X-Star Premium figures come from US retailer listings; its sensor size, bitrate and overall dimensions are not published there. Used-unit condition, especially battery health, matters more than specs.

Primary sources

  1. 1. shop.autelrobotics.com
  2. 2. www.dronefly.com
  3. 3. dronedj.com
  4. 4. www.adorama.com
  5. 5. www.bhphotovideo.com
  6. 6. www.faa.gov

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, on almost every published specification. The Nano+ has a much larger 1/1.28-inch 50 MP sensor, three-direction obstacle sensing, a 10 km (FCC) transmission range, 28 minutes of rated flight time and weighs 249 g. The X-Star Premium only leads on top speed, 16 m/s against 15 m/s, and on high-frame-rate 1080p and 720p video.